{"id":6939,"date":"2026-09-03T12:03:30","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T04:03:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.huameicarbon.com\/?p=6939"},"modified":"2026-09-07T11:56:49","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T03:56:49","slug":"jacobi-picagold-g210as-vs-hmgold-7500-cil-gold-carbon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.huameicarbon.com\/tr\/jacobi-picagold-g210as-vs-hmgold-7500-cil-gold-carbon\/","title":{"rendered":"Jacobi PICAGOLD G210AS Alternative"},"content":{"rendered":"

Most activated carbon comparisons stop at the spec sheet \u2014 iodine number, hardness, ash content. Useful for procurement paperwork, but not for predicting what happens inside a CIL circuit where carbon spends months being pumped through abrasive ore slurry, screened at high velocity, stripped in acid, and thermally reactivated \u2014 over and over.<\/p>\n

This article compares Jacobi PICAGOLD G210AS and Huamei HMGOLD\u21227500<\/a> based on verified data: Jacobi's official gold recovery brochure parameters for G210AS, and Huamei's SGS test report (No. MSRCZ2500346-01A) for HMGOLD\u21227500. Where data is available, we compare directly. Where it isn't, we say so.<\/p>\n

\"HMGOLD<\/h2>\n

Spec Sheet: Head-to-Head<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Parametre<\/th>\nJacobi PICAGOLD G210AS<\/th>\nHuamei HMGOLD\u21227500<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Raw material<\/strong><\/td>\nCoconut shell<\/td>\nCoconut shell<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Activation<\/strong><\/td>\nSteam<\/td>\nSteam<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u0130yot say\u0131s\u0131<\/strong><\/td>\nNot primary metric*<\/td>\n1150mg\/g<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
k\u00fcl i\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/td>\n\u22644%<\/td>\n2.52% (SGS)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Nem<\/strong><\/td>\n\u22645%<\/td>\n\u22645%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hardness\/Strength<\/strong><\/td>\n\u226599% (ball-pan)<\/td>\n98.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
K value (gold loading)<\/strong><\/td>\n28 kg\/t<\/td>\n28 kg\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
R value (adsorption kinetics)<\/strong><\/td>\n60%<\/td>\n58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
a\u011f boyutu<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00d712 or 8\u00d716<\/td>\n6\u00d712, 8\u00d716<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*Jacobi's gold recovery brochure does not use iodine number as a primary specification for G210AS. This is standard practice \u2014 iodine measures total microporosity, not gold-specific adsorption capacity. K value and R value are the metrics Jacobi uses to define gold carbon performance.<\/em><\/p>\n

Attrition: Where Gold Gets Lost<\/h2>\n

Carbon attrition is the single largest source of unrecoverable gold loss in CIL circuits. When carbon breaks into fines smaller than your screen aperture, those fines \u2014 loaded with adsorbed gold \u2014 pass through inter-stage screens and exit with tailings.<\/p>\n

Hardness: The Test Method Problem<\/h3>\n